ITA | ENG
In the book “Hikikomori, the young people who don’t leave the house” I analyze the phenomenon of social isolation in youths starting from the main scientific research published up to this point and integrating it with what is my direct observed experience developed over the last seven years of study.
At the end of the article I also present the results of the absolute first statistical survey on the subject on a national level, which involved 288 mothers and fathers of the Hikikomori ItaliaParents ONLUS Association, and from which emerged some extremely valuable data to be able to better define the nature of the issue.
Here are some of the more interesting statistics.
87.85% of the selected sample has a socially isolated male
child. Despite such data confirming what emerged from Japanese surveys
regarding the prevalence of male hikikomori, the gender imbalance seems
excessive, both with respect to the Japanese data (that talk of 63.3% of young
males), and with in regards to my direct experience.
I have, in fact, reason to believe that female hikikomori
represent a sensibly greater number than what emerged from the research and the
reason is to be found, with all probability, in the different level of level of
alertness that is culturally enacted when males are socially isolated rather
than females.
The length of isolation has been confirmed to be usually
prolonged: most male children children, in fact, appears to have been in
isolation for over three years, with an average age of around 20 years old.
This piece of data is unfortunately destined to grow in the near future since
the hikikomori represents a problem with greatrisk of chronicization. In fact, in Japan, where this phenomenon erupted
far earlier than in Italy, thenumber of isolated subjects over 40 years old is sensibly higher than inour country.
Particularly of note is the piece of data relative to the
onset of the issue: the average age at which the first signs of hikikomori
start to show is around 15 years old, which goes to show that the absolutely
the most delicate period is the one which marks the shift from middle-school
over to high-school.
Here, though, is where the first discrepancy emerges in
relation to the Japanese data. In fact, in Japan, the most critical period
doesn’t seem to be the one equivalent to middle-school, but rather the one
situate post diploma, with 42.9% of people starting their withdrawal between 20
and 29 years old. The reason is probably linked to the highly competitive
university system, where failing an admission test is often a
determining factor in the start of the isolation.
The interpretation of the phenomenon contained in the book
thinks of the hikikomori not as a rigid personal state, but rather as a
condition that can have varying degrees of intensity and gravity (I wrote about
it at length in this
post).
Most of the sample involves subjects in the 2° stage, that
is to say when the drive towards social isolation has already been rationally
interpreted by the subject and they have established a valid reason for the
choice of their withdrawal. This is the phase in which school is completely
abandoned and almost all direct social contact is pushed away, with the
exception of the closest relatives.
The third stage, which represents total isolation, that is
to say when parents and virtual relationships are also avoided, is the rarest
and affects only 6.69% of the studied sample. Those who find themselves in this
condition have truly developed some type of psychopathology associated with
their isolation.
Conclusion
The data that emerged from the survey open numerous avenues
of reflection and allow a first quantitative analysis of the phenomenon. In
this article only a small portion of it was presented with respect to what is
contained in the book. The most interesting ones regard geographic
distribution, the relationship with new technologies, and that with the
parents.
Moreover, a second study is presented in the text where the questionnaire was administered directly to 89 subjects in a condition of social isolation. Most of the results are comparable to the ones in the main survey but there are also come contradictions, such as, for example, the predisposition to receive help as reported by the parents compared to that manifested by their children.
Related articles: